ANALISA PEMBELIAN BARANG UNDERPRICED SEBAGI BENTUK KESALAHAN DELIK PENADAHAN: TINJAUAN YURIDIS YURISPRUDENSI MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2/YUR/PID/2018

Vina Putri Salim, Tsamara Probo Ningrum, Risma Cahya Yudita Pratama, Nur Fadilah

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to find out the application of Supreme Court Jurisprudence Number 2 / Yur / Pid / 2018 which provides legal rules related to underpriced purchases as the fulfillment of the element "should be suspected that it was obtained from criminal offenses" in the offense. This research is legal research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The research results obtained are the application of the new legal rules in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence Number 2 / Yur / Pid / 2018 to the element of negligence in the offense delimitation in Article 480 of the Criminal Code. are required by law and do not exercise caution as required by law which is an element of negligence. In the element of not making guesses as required by law, it is related to the inner attitude of society in general, wherein movable objects the authorities are considered as the owner and society, in general, cannot know the market price of each movable object. This is different from immovable objects, where the authorities are not always the owners, where ownership is generally based on certificates so that the general public can know the price of the immovable object. In its development, registered and unregistered objects were born, whereas, in registered objects, the general public could find out the price of these registered objects, because ownership of these registered objects could be known publicly. About not taking the precautions required by law, which must be seen whether there is a behavior of the defendant to take preventive measures related to the origin of the goods, where when the buyer/seller has taken precautionary measures, it can be said that the buyer/seller has done the duty to be careful so that it cannot be said that negligence has occurred.

Keywords

: Fencing Delict; Supreme Court Jurisprudence; Underpriced Objects

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agung, P. Y. M. (2019). Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung.

Bahri, S., & Hafidz, J. (2017). Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Testament Yang Dibuat Di Hadapan Notaris Dalam Perspektif Keadilan. Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda, 4(2), 152–157.

Barus, Z. (2017). Analisis Filosofis Tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis. Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 313.

Budiyanto, C., Prananto, Tan, F, T. (2019). Designing Embedded Case Study Research Approach in Educational Research. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 3(1), 1–18.

Dilva Muzdaliva Sawotong. (2014). Jaminan Kebendaan Pada PT. Pegadaian Terhadap Barang Yang Digadaikan. Lex Privatum, 3(1), 36–46.

Eisenberg, M. A. (2018). Foundational Principles of Contract Law. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.

Hamzah, A. (2010). Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di Dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Pidana Universitas Trisakti.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2015). Prinsip- Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Ibrahim, J. E. dan J. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). Jakarta: Pranada Media.

Isnaeni, M. (2000). Benda Terdaftar dalam Konstelasi Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 7(13), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss13.art4

Isnaeni, M. (2018). Seberkas Diorama Hukum Kontrak. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media.

Kholil, M. (2018). Tinjauan Empiris Pasal 480 Kuhp Tentang Penadahan Menyangkut Hak-Hak Konsumen Dalam Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 12, 28–38.

Lamintang. (2009). Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan terhadap Harta Kekayaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Moelijatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Muhdlor, A. Z. (2012). Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 190–206.

Murray Raff. (2015). The Importance of Reforming Civil Law in Formerly Socialist Legal Systems. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(1), 24–32.

Muten Nuna & Roy Marthen Moonti, Kebebasan Hak Sosial Politik Dan Partisipasi Warga Negara Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Volume 4 Nomor 2 Oktober 2019.

Pieter Albert Carstens. (1984). Revisiting The Maxim Imperitia Culpae Adnumeratur In Context Of Medical Negligence – Can The Maxim Be Extended To Include The Application Of Luxuria? 1(1), 613–622.

Setiadi, E., & Kristian. (2017). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadau dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Soekanto, S. (2005). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sri Soedewi Masjchoen Sofwan. (1980). Hukum Jaminan di ndonesia, Pokok-pokok HukumJaminan Perorangan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Yakin, M. K. (2017). Ratio Decidendi Penetapan Pengesahan (Itsbat) Nikah Di Pengadilan Agama. Yuridika, 30(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v30i2.4655

Yanti, R. (2013). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Secara Berlanjut. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 1(5), 1–10.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.