MENGAPA PENGACARA MEMILIH KANTOR VIRTUAL? (STUDI HUKUM DAN LITERASI DIGITAL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v4i2.1848Keywords:
Lawyers, virtual offices, digital literacy, and lawAbstract
The purpose of this study was to discuss why lawyers choose virtual offices? To keep the conversation interesting, we have collected data from online databases such as books, journals, websites, and other free online materials. After collecting data, we analyzed through interpretation using coding, evaluation, and conclusion drawing to find data to be valid and reliable. This study thoroughly used the second data and description in the design report qualitatively. Based on the study and discussion of the data findings, we could conclude that lawyers prefer to set up online or virtual offices because current technology and databases have become trendy in law-seeking communities and even lawyers. Another reason is that technology can be more practical, effective, and cost-effective on building rent, and it is difficult for clients to meet lawyers. Therefore, this new finding is helpful for those who conduct future studies of digital and legal literacy.
References
Aguer, C., Fiehn, O., Seifert, E. L., Bézaire, V., Meissen, J. K., Daniels, A., Scott, K., Renaud, J.-M., Padilla, M., & Bickel, D. R. (2013). Muscle uncoupling protein 3 overexpression mimics endurance training and reduces circulating biomarkers of incomplete β-oxidation. The FASEB Journal, 27(10), 4213–4225.
Allen, J. (2012). Technology for the Mobile Lawyer in All of Us. GPSolo, 29, 4.
Ani, K. U. (2018). Virtual Law Firms in Nigeria: A Chimera or the New Reality Model Law Practice? Available at SSRN 3178478.
Barton, B. H. (2014). A glass half full look at the changes in the American legal market. International Review of Law and Economics, 38, 29–42.
Berry, L. L., Bolton, R. N., Bridges, C. H., Meyer, J., Parasuraman, A., & Seiders, K. (2010). Opportunities for innovation in the delivery of interactive retail services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(2), 155–167.
Bowden, J. A., Heckert, A., Ulmer, C. Z., Jones, C. M., Koelmel, J. P., Abdullah, L., Ahonen, L., Alnouti, Y., Armando, A. M., & Asara, J. M. (2017). Harmonizing lipidomics: NIST interlaboratory comparison exercise for lipidomics using SRM 1950–Metabolites in Frozen Human Plasma [S]. Journal of lipid research, 58(12), 2275–2288.
Browne-Barbour, V. S. (2012). A Fork in the Road: The Intersection of Virtual Law Practice and Social Media. Washburn LJ, 52, 267.
Bryant, G. (2020). Maintaining Young Lawyer Well-Being in a Pandemic.
Burnett, P. J., & Burnett, J. (2013). Plenty and Want: A social history of food in England from 1815 to the present day. Routledge.
Caserta, S., & Madsen, M. R. (2019). The legal profession in the era of digital capitalism: Disruption or new dawn? Laws, 8(1), 1.
Chakraborti, T., Isahagian, V., Khalaf, R., Khazaeni, Y., Muthusamy, V., Rizk, Y., & Unuvar, M. (2020). From Robotic Process Automation to Intelligent Process Automation. International Conference on Business Process Management, 215–228.
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2016). The agile–stage-gate hybrid model: A promising new approach and a new research opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(5), 513–526.
Cuyler, A., & Black, N. (2009). Virtual Law Practice: A Passing Trend or the Wave of the Future. GPSolo, 26, 48.
Dzienkowski, J. S. (2013). The future of big law: Alternative legal service providers to corporate clients. Fordham L. Rev., 82, 2995.
Fenwick, M., & Vermeulen, E. P. (2019). The Lawyer of the Future as “Transaction Engineerâ€: Digital Technologies and the Disruption of the Legal Profession. Dalam Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain (hlm. 253–272). Springer.
Ferguson, A., & Lee, E. (2012). Desperately Seeking-Relevant Assessment-A Case Study on the Potential for Using Online Simulated Group Bases Learning to Create Sustainable Assessment Practices. Legal Educ. Rev., 22, 121.
Gibson, K. W. (2008). Outsourcing legal services abroad. Law Practice Magazine, 34(5), 47.
Gillers, S. (2012). How to Make Rules for Lawyers: The Professional Responsibility of the Legal Profession. Pepp. L. Rev., 40, 365.
Granat, R., & Kimbro, S. (2017). The future of virtual law practice. Haskins, P. The Relevant Lawyer Re-imaging the Future of the Legal Profession. Chicago, ABA Standing Committee on Professionalism Center for Professional Responsibility.
Ha-Redeye, O. (2013). Virtual Offices Provide Promising Opportunities. Ontario Bar Association TECHxpo (2013).
Hausman, J. (2012). Who’s Afraid of the Virtual Lawyers-The Role of Legal Ethics in the Growth and Regulation of Virtual Law Offices. Geo. J. Legal Ethics, 25, 575.
Hazelwood, K. J. (2014). Technology and Client Communications: Preparing Law Students and New Lawyers to Make Choices That Comply with the Ethical Duties of Confidentiality, Competence, and Communication. Miss. LJ, 83, 245.
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Seneviratne, S. I., Sheffield, J., Goulden, M. L., Bonan, G., Cescatti, A., Chen, J., & De Jeu, R. (2010). Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature, 467(7318), 951–954.
Kimbro, S. L. (2010). Practicing law without an office address: How the bona fide office requirement affects virtual law practice. U. Dayton L. Rev., 36, 1.
Klinkner, B. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Law Offices Expected to Be Top Technological Trends Impacting the Legal Profession in 2017. The Wyoming Lawyer, February.
Kriescher, M. (2009). Professional benefits of online social networking. Colo. Law, 38, 61–64.
Leeuw, F. L., & Schmeets, H. (2016). Empirical legal research: A guidance book for lawyers, legislators and regulators. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Light, S. H., Su, L., Rivera-Lugo, R., Cornejo, J. A., Louie, A., Iavarone, A. T., Ajo-Franklin, C. M., & Portnoy, D. A. (2018). A flavin-based extracellular electron transfer mechanism in diverse Gram-positive bacteria. Nature, 562(7725), 140–144.
Lowry, G. V., Avellan, A., & Gilbertson, L. M. (2019). Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution. Nature nanotechnology, 14(6), 517–522.
Lynch, B. L. (2015). Access to Legal Services in Rural Areas of the Northern Rockies: A Recommendation for Town Legal Centers. Ind. LJ, 90, 1683.
Naik-Mathuria, B. J., Rosenfeld, E. H., Gosain, A., Burd, R., Falcone Jr, R. A., Thakkar, R., Gaines, B., Mooney, D., Escobar, M., & Jafri, M. (2017). Proposed clinical pathway for nonoperative management of high-grade pediatric pancreatic injuries based on a multicenter analysis: A pediatric trauma society collaborative. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 83(4), 589–596.
Neukomm, E. (1886). Fêtes et spectacles du vieux Paris. E. Dentu.
Omoola, S. O., & Oseni, U. A. (2016). Towards an effective legal framework for online dispute resolution in e-commerce transactions: Trends, traditions and transitions. IIUM Law Journal, 24(1).
Powell, A. E., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Poulin, E. J., Means, A. L., Washington, M. K., Higginbotham, J. N., Juchheim, A., Prasad, N., & Levy, S. E. (2012). The pan-ErbB negative regulator Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker that functions as a tumor suppressor. Cell, 149(1), 146–158.
Rhode, D. L. (2015). The trouble with lawyers. Oxford University Press, USA.
Sela, A. (2017). The effect of online technologies on dispute resolution system design: Antecedents, current trends, and future directions. Lewis & Clark L. Rev., 21, 635.
Sil, R., Roy, A., Bhushan, B., & Mazumdar, A. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence and machine learning based legal application: The state-of-the-art and future research trends. 2019 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), 57–62.
Silverberg, J. I. (2010). Hanging out Your Virtual Shingle: A Look at How South Carolina’s Ethics Rules concerning Attorney Communications, Advertising, and Solicitation Apply to Virtual Worlds. SCL Rev., 62, 715.
Sundquist, C. (2020). The Future of Law Schools: Covid-19, Technology, and Social Justice. Conn. L. Rev. CONNtemplations, 53, 1.
Terry, L. S. (2013). Trends in global and Canadian lawyer regulation. Sask. L. Rev., 76, 145.
Wang, P., Wu, P., Wang, J., Chi, H.-L., & Wang, X. (2018). A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(6), 1204.
Webley, L. (2010). Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research, 927, 927.
Wood, M. E., Nagle, J. E., & Pierson, P. B. (2014). A Qualitative Examination of Self-Care in Lawyers. Jury Expert, 26, 26.
