MODEL ALTERNATIF PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 2/PUU-XIX/2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i1.2110Keywords:
Alternative Model, Execution of Fiduciary Guarantee Object, Legal Protection, Constitutional Court Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021Abstract
The purpose of this research is to evaluate and analyze the Constitutional Court's Decision 2/PUU-XIX/202 on different methods of executing the object of fiduciary security. This is legal research that employs two methodologies, namely the Statute Approach and the Conceptual Approach). The results of this study indicate that the execution parate, which in theory is a simplified execution without the involvement of a court, will degrade, with a high probability that the debtor will prefer execution through the court, with various potential excuses that can be used in accordance with the conditions set forth in the Constitutional Court's decision. The alternative model, as outlined in this decision, seeks to provide legal protection for creditors and debtors to be accommodated correctly and fairly, owing to the fact that each party to the agreement has legal rights.
References
Ambarita, D. Analisis Yuridis Atas Sertifikat Fidusia Yang Hilang Berkaitan Dengan Pendaftaran Perubahan Fidusia Pada Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia Di Medan. repositori.usu.ac.id, 2018. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/3784.
Andhyka Muchtar. “Akibat Hukum Terbitnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Terhadap Kewenangan Lembaga Peradilan Dalam Memutus Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.†Diversi Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 4, No. 2 (2021): 150–79. https://doi.org/10.32503343.
Efferin, James Ridwan. “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.†Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12, No. 1 (2020): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.789.
Emrizal, R F. “Parate Eksekusi Dalam Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Benda Terdaftar Bukan Atas Nama Debitor,†2016. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/33306.
Febriyanti, Wiwin Dwi Ratna. “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.†ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol. 6, No. 2 (2021): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.128.
Heriawanto, Benny Krestian. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial.†Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 27, No. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8958.
Kartika Dengah. “Eksistensi Serta Akibat Penerapan Sistem Terbuka Pada Hukum Perikatan.†Lex Privatum Vol. 3, No. 4 (2015): 143–51.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Kontrak Bernuansa Islam. PT. Rajagrafindo Persaja, 2012.
Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi, and Nurlaili Rahmawati. “Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia Berdasarkan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 2/PUU-XIX/2021.†Al WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 77–91.
Nurhayani dan Elok Hikmawati. “Penerapan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kendaraan Bermotor Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Kelas IA Khusus.†Lex Jurnalica Vol. 18, No. 1 (2021): 48–55.
Putusan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. (2021).
Rachmadi Usman, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan Cetakan Kedua. Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Riswandie, Iwan. “EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA BERASASKAN KEADILAN PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO. 18/PUU- XVII/2019†Vol. 2, No. 3 (2021): 365–84.
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti dan Leonora Bakarbessy. Buku Referensi Hukum Perbankan: Hukum Jaminan. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media, 2014.
Wahyuni, Yeyen. “Parate Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.†Interdisciplinary Journal On Law, Social Sciences And Humanities Vol. 2, No. 1 (2021): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijl.v12i1.22760.
Widjaja, Erich Kurniawan, and William Tandya Putra. “Karakteristik Hak Kebendaan Pada Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Benda Persediaan.†JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 12, No. 1 (June 25, 2019): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2316.
Witanto, D. Y. Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Aspek Perikatan, Pendaftaran, Dan Eksekusi). Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2015.
