ABUSE OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR HATE SPEECH ACTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i2.2352Keywords:
Hate speech, Social media, Technology and Informatics.Abstract
The development of technology and information technology has resulted in freedom of opinion and expression which often leads to hate speech. So it is necessary to have clear limits on what actions can be classified as hate speech and to determine whether a person can be held criminally responsible. It is known that hate speech that often occurs is usually related to insults, defamation, blasphemy, unpleasant acts, provocations, and attempts to incite. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the criminal responsibility of the perpetrators of hate speech has been regulated in several laws and regulations including the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Criminal Code, Law 9/1998, Human Rights Law, ITE Law, Law 40/2008, in addition to There is Circular Letter Number SE/6/X/2015 concerning Handling Hate Speech. There is no understanding about how to properly use social media to be one of the causes of hate speech, resulting in negative impacts. Social media which has been a place to communicate has changed its function. So that the issue of hate speech must be addressed intelligently by the community so that people are not easily instigated by hate speech that occurs. It is necessary to instill an understanding that hate speech will have a negative impact that can damage the life of the nation and state. For this reason, efforts to resolve hate speech can be done through penal and non-penal efforts. The police as the front line in handling and eradicating hate speech cases are assisted by the Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia. As well as the importance of participation by fellow social media users to remind each other if one of them takes actions that lead to hate speech, as the saying goes, prevention is better than cure.References
Adami Chazawi, A. F. (2015). Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. MNC Publishing.
Agustanti, R. D., & Setiawan, A. N. (2021). Tindak Pidana Penipuan Pada Transaksi E-Commerce Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Era Hukum-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/erahukum.v19i1.11155
Arief, B. N. (2005). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Awaluddin, Afif Khalid, F. A. S. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) [Universitas Islam Kalimantan]. In Universitas Islam Kalimantan. http://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac.id/9294/
Ayu Efritadewi. (2020). Modul Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). UMRAH Press. https://law.umrah.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MODUL-HUKUM-PIDANA.pdf
Budi Suhariyanto. (2014). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (CYBERCRIME). PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Febriansyah, F. I., & Purwinarto, H. S. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.177-188
Fitri, S. (2017). Dampak Positif Dan Negatif Sosial Media Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Anak. NATURALISTIC : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v1i2.5
Hairi, P. J. (2019). Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terkait Ujaran Kebencian. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan Strategis, XI(3), 1–6. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/Info Singkat-XI-3-I-P3DI-Februari-2019-240.pdf
HSB, A. M. (2016). Mengkritisi Pemberlakuan Teori Fiksi Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(3), 251–264.
Hutomo, D. (2018). Bentuk Penghinaan yang bisa dijerat Pasal tentang Hate Speech. Hukumonline.Com.
Manusia, K. N. H. A. (2015). Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). In Komisi Hak Asasi Manusia (Vol. 1). Komisi Hak Asasi Manusia. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Buku_saku_penanganan_ujaran_kebencian_ha.html?id=F6U0xQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Muhaimin, A. M. dalam. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Pamuji, E. (2020). Ujaran Kebencian Pada Ruang – Ruang Digital. Jurnal Kajian Media, 4(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.25139/jkm.v4i2.2811
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2022). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi (Revisi). Kencana.
POLRI. (2015). Surat Edaran Kapolri tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). In Mabes Polri (Vol. 10, Issue SE, p. 06).
R.Soesilo. (2003). Kitab-Kitab Undang Hukum Pidana Serta Komentar-Komentar Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Politea.
Roihanah, R. (2015). PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA: Sebuah Harapan dan Kenyataan. Justicia Islamica. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v12i1.258
Sahrul Mauludi. (2018). Awas Hoax! lex Media Komputindo.
Saragih, H., Sahari, A., & Syahbana, T. E. (2021). Legalitas. Legalitas Jurnal Hukum, 13(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v13i2.267
Sianturi, E. Y. K. dan S. R. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya.
Soedarto. (2006). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. PT Alumni.
Sultan Ali Sya’bana, Warasman Marbun, L. Y. K. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Media Elektronik. Jurnal Krisna Law, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37893/krisnalaw.v3i2.420
Syahdeini, S. R. (2009). Kejahatan Dan Tindak Pidana Komputer. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Syahputra, I. (2017). Demokrasi Virtual Dan Perang Siber Di Media Sosial: Perspektif Netizen Indonesia. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i3.141
Theo Huijbers. (2011). Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Kanisius.
Walukow, J. M. (2013). Perwujudan Prinsip Equality Before The Law Bagi Narapidana Di Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 1(1), 116–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v1i1.1320
