THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF PERSONS OF CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF FORGERY AND FORGER CURRENCY REVIEWED FROM A POSITIVE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i2.2572Abstract
The criminal act of currency counterfeiting is a crime that attacks public confidence in the authenticity of currency, therefore the truth of the currency value must be guaranteed from counterfeiting. Based on the description, the objectives are to find out how the current regulation of counterfeiting and circulation of counterfeit money is, and to find out how to enforce the law against the perpetrators of counterfeiting and circulating counterfeit money. The method used by the author in this study is a normative juridical approach using primary and secondary data collection techniques and data collection tools used through interviews and document studies. The results of this study with the theme of research on the responsibility of the perpetrators of the crime of counterfeiting and circulating counterfeit money. From a positive legal perspective, counterfeiting and circulation of counterfeit money carried out by perpetrators as makers and dealers must have fulfilled the elements in the formulation of Articles 244 and 245 of the Criminal Code. Law enforcement against perpetrators of counterfeiting and circulation of counterfeit money is carried out by law enforcement officers starting from the police, prosecutors and courts in the stages of the criminal justice system in Indonesia which aims to impose penalties on perpetrators of criminal acts of counterfeiting money and prevent and cope with people becoming victims of counterfeiting money, resolving criminal cases and create a deterrent effect for perpetrators of criminal acts of counterfeiting and circulating counterfeit money.
References
Camelia, S. M., Pratiwi, S., & Krisnalita, L. Y. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Peredaran Uang Palsu Berdasarkan Pasal 245 KUHP. Jurnal Krisna Law, 1(3), 99–108.
Dewi, E. (2014a). Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pemalsuan uang dan pengedar uang palsu. Jurnal Keadilan Progresif, 5(1).
Dewi, E. (2014b). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Uang Dan Pengedar Uang Palsu Di Kota Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Keadilan Progresif, 5(1).
Harahap, M. F. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Sindikat Pengedar Uang Palsu Yang dilakukan oleh oknum polisi dan warga sipil,. Universitas Muhamadiyah Sumatra Utara Medan.
Husen, H. M. (1990). Kejahatan dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Mata Uang Dunia dan Asal Usul Sejarahnya diakses. (2020).
Moeljatno. (1993). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Putra Harsa.
Putro, B. P. H., & Soponyono, E. (2018). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Uang. Jurnal Law Reform.
Rakhmadsyah, T., & Hadi, A. (2018). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Uang Sebagai Kejahatan Terorganisir (Suatu Penelitian Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala, 2(2), 289.
Sarah, Siswantari, & Louisa. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Peredaran Uang Palsu Berdasarkan Pasal 245 KUHP (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 381/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Jkt.Tim). Jurnal Krisna Law, 1(3).
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Rajawali.
Suwarjo. (2014). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Mata Uang Dollar. Journal Rechstaat Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum UNSA, 8(1), 7.
Tim Perundang-Undangan dan Pengkajian Hukum. (2005). Paradigma Baru dalam Menghadapi Kejahatan Mata Uang (Pola Pikir, Pengaturan, dan Penegakan Hukum). Direktorat Hukum Bank Indonesia.
Utama, A. S. (2011). Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Ensiklopedia Social Review, 1(3), 306–307.
