Innovative Strategy for the Application of Discretion in Government Policy in Indonesia: An Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i1.3357Keywords:
Discretion, Innovation, Government Policy, Discretion Criteria, Discretion Model.Abstract
The objective of this study is to recognise the following: discretion as a kind of innovation in government policy application; discretionary criteria as an innovation in government policy carrying the benefit principle; and discretionary models as an innovation in government policy seen to be ideal. This study used a statutory approach in conjunction with a normative legal strategy. The discussion's conclusions demonstrate that, in order to encourage official innovation, discretionary regulation—a kind of government policy innovation—must be implemented. This phase entails rejecting a passivity in the realisation of innovation and pursuing harmony between innovation and legislation. Four factors are taken into consideration while evaluating discretion as a novel government policy: power, constraints, testing, and judicial oversight. The welfare state's core principles must serve as the foundation for the discretionary model that is seen to be best for developing innovative policies that accomplish bureaucratic transformation. Discretionary policies should also encourage collaboration between authorities and adhere to Pancasila's tenets. Moreover, discretionary policies must abide with the fundamentals of good governance (AUPB).
References
Address by Robert Klitgaard: Carter Center Conference on Transparency for Growth in the Americas. (n.d.). The Carter Center. Retrieved January 28, 2024, from https://www.cartercenter.org/news/documents/doc1193.html
Aqmarani, A. Y., Susanto, S. N. H., & Juliani, H. (2021). SISTEM IZIN INVESTASI MUDAH DAN TERPADU (SI IMUT) SEBAGAI WUJUD PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK YANG IDEAL BERDASARKAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP GOOD GOVERNANCE DI DINAS PENANAMAN MODAL DAN PELAYANAN TERPADU SATU PINTU KOTA SEMARANG. Diponegoro Law Journal, 10(2), 274–287.
Darumurti, K. D. (2014). PERSPEKTIF FILOSOFIS KONSEP KEKUASAAN DISKRESI PEMERINTAH. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2014.v8.i1.p41-60
Davis, K. (1955). Mandatory Relief from Administrative Action in the Federal Courts. University of Chicago Law Review, 22(3). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol22/iss3/2
Dwiyanto, A. (2013). Mengembalikan Kepercayaan Publik Melalui REFORMASI BIROKRASI. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. UGM PRESS.
Elviandri, E. (2019). QUO VADIS NEGARA KESEJAHTERAAN: MENEGUHKAN IDEOLOGI WELFARE STATE NEGARA HUKUM KESEJAHTERAAN INDONESIA. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 31(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.32986
Firdaus, F. R., & Erliyana, A. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN KEBIJAKAN DISKRESI DALAM PENANGANAN COVID-19 MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2020. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v6i2.2128
Fletcher, G. P. (1998). Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. OUP USA.
Gellhorn, E., & Boyer, B. B. (1981). Administrative Law and Process in a Nutshell. West Publishing Company.
H, B. (2002). Constitutional and Administrative Law (4th edition). Misc.
Hoessein, B. (2009). Dalam Pengantar Buku Peta Konsep Desentralisasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah. Karya Khairul Muluk. ITS Press. Surabaya.
Irfan, I. M. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip perumusan kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ishaq, H. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum dan penulisan skripsi. ALFABETA.
Khoirunnisak, R., Arishanti, D., & Vebrianti, D. D. (2018). PENERAPAN E-BUDGETING PEMERINTAH KOTA SURABAYA DALAM MENCAPAI GOOD GOVERNANCE. UNEJ E-Proceeding, 249–256.
KPU Sebut Tidak Ada Asuransi Kesehatan Untuk Petugas KPPS. (n.d.). suara.com. Retrieved January 28, 2024, from https://www.suara.com/news/2019/04/18/194833/kpu-sebut-tidak-ada-asuransi-kesehatan-untuk-petugas-kpps
Media, K. C. (2020, January 22). Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia. KOMPAS.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/22/15460191/refleksi-pemilu-2019-sebanyak-894-petugas-kpps-meninggal-dunia
Mustamu, J. (2011). Diskresi dan tanggungjawab administrasi pemerintahan. Sasi, 17(2), 1–9.
Nurmayani, & Farida, M. (2021). Problematika Konsep Diskresi dalam Penyelenggaraan Administrasi Pemerintahan pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v1i1.412
Roseffendi, R. (2018). Hubungan Korelatif Hukum Dan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Al Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam, 3(2), 189–198.
Sahputra, M. (2021). PERKEMBANGAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA PADA MASA PANDEMI. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 11(01), Article 01. https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v11i01.187
Salsabila, A. (2022). Expansion of the Discretion Concept Reviewed from Legal Anti-Positivism. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 16(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.479-494
Setiawan, A., & Asyikin, N. (2020). TANGGUNG JAWAB JABATAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PRIBADI DALAM PENGGUNAAN DISKRESI SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PELAYANAN PUBLIK (PUBLIC SERVICE). Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 32(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.48017
Setiyono, D. B. (2023). Birokrasi dalam Perspektif Politik dan Administrasi. Nuansa Cendekia.
Setyobudi, S. (2022). Pengaruh Pemahaman Sistem Akuntansi, Pengelolaan Keuangan, Kapasitas Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi Dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v3i3.1281
Solechan, S. (2019). Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Pelayanan Publik. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i3.541-557
Strait, G. A. (1960). A bibliography of the writings of Roscoe Pound, 1940-1960.
Sudrajat, T. (2009). PERWUJUDAN GOOD GOVERNANCE MELALUI FORMAT REFORMASI BIROKRASI PUBLIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2009.9.2.220
Suhartono, J. F., & Sawitri, H. S. R. (2017). Pengaruh reward, insentif, pembagian tugas dan pengembangan karier pada kepuasan kerja perawat di rumah sakit ortopedi Prof. Dr. R. Soeharso Surakarta. Benefit: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis (Jurnal Ini Sudah Migrasi), 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23917/benefit.v2i1.3144
Sunarti, D. H., Desy Hariyati, dan Eka Sri. (2017). Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Transisi. Kencana.
Sururi, A. (2016). INOVASI KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK (TINJAUAN KONSEPTUAL DAN EMPIRIS). Sawala Prodi Adminstrasi Negara Unsera, 4 Nomor 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v4i3.241
Suteja, M. (2013). PENGAWASAN TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG POLRI MENGADAKAN TINDAKAN LAIN MENURUT HUKUM YANG BERTANGGUNG JAWAB (DISKRESI). Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i02.p10
Taekema, S. (2019). Two Realist Idealists Theorizing the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(2), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00107-0
Wade, W., & Forsyth, C. F. (2014). Administrative Law. Oxford University Press.
Wahyudi, A. (2017). Problematizations of Discretion Policy in Indonesia’s Administration Law Number 30 of 2014 (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2866782). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2866782
Warsito, T. Y. (2003). Otonomi Daerah (Capacity Building dan Penguatan Demokrasi lokal). Puskodak UNDIP, Semarang.
Wicaksono, I. (2019). OPTIMALISASI PERAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM NASIONAL DENGAN MODEL PREVENTIVE REVIEW. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 49(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v49i1.94
Williams, D. G. T. (1994). Law and Administrative Discretion. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2(1), 191–212.
www.dailyklik.id. (2022, August 5). Rizal Taufiqurrahman: Dana PEN Kehilangan Arah dan Tidak Transparan. dailyklik.id. https://www.dailyklik.id/2022/08/05/rizal-taufiqurrahman-dana-pen-kehilangan-arah-dan-tidak-transparan/
ç¾…æ£®ç¶ Phil Rosenzweigè‘— ; å¾ç´¹æ•è¯., Rosenzweig, P. M., & å¾ç´¹æ•. (2007). 光環效應 (Di 1 ban). 商智文化事æ¥è‚¡ä»½æœ‰é™å…¬å¸.
