KUALITAS PARTISIPASI PUBLIK: STUDI IMPLEMENTASI E-LEGISLASI DI BADAN PENGEMBANGAN HUKUM NASIONAL (BPHN) INDONESIA

Ari Khusrini Khusrini, Teguh Kurniawan

Abstract

BPHN is one of the implementing subjects in the stages of national legislation, which has a portal is an interface for the public to actively participate in the formation of legislation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of the implementation of public participation-based e-legislation at BPHN. This study uses qualitative data collection techniques using data period from 2016-2019. The study show that the quality of the implementation of e-legislation based on public participation not optimum yet, due to: (i) unpreparedness of the social environment; (ii) the less quality of the portal; (iii) institutional capacity and organization relations problems; (iv) unreadiness of e-rulemaking framework; and (v) system run without operational regulation base.

Keywords

e-legislation, e-rulemaking, public participation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books

Coglianese, Cary. (2004). E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and Regulatory Policy: New Directions in Digital Government Research. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government Center for Business and Government.

Coglianese, Cary. (2007). E-Rulemaking. Encyclopedia of Digital Government Vol I-Z. United States of America: Idea Group Reference.

Creighton, James L. (2005). The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. 1st edition. United States of America: Jossey-Bass.

Articles

Benjamin, S. M. (2006). Evaluating E-rulemaking: Public participation and political institutions. Duke Law Journal, 55(5), 893-941.

Boyer, William W. (1990). Political Science and the 21st Century: From Government to Governance. Political Science and Politics. 23(1): p. 50-54

Decman, Jukic, Kunstelj, and Vintar. (2009). E-Government in Slovene Municipalities: Analysing Supply, Demand and its Effects. Handbook of Research on Strategies for Local e-Government Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies. (2009): p.22. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-282-4.ch009. Dooling, Bridget C.E. (2011). Legal Issues In ERulemaking. Administrative Law Review 63, no. 4 (2011): 893-932 http://www.jstor.org/stable/23065491. [accessed 22.02.2019]

Farina, Newhart, and Heidt. (2014). Rulemaking vs. Democracy: Judging And Nudging PublicParticipation That Counts. Cornell University Law Library. United States of America: New York.

Harechko, Iryna. (2011). Basic Mechanisms of E-Participation of Citizens in Policy Making. Torunskie Studia Miedzynarodowe Vol 4. 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2011.002. [accessed 22.02.2019]

Jones, Gregory D. (2010). Electronic Rulemaking in the New Age Of Openness: Proposing A Voluntary Two-Tier Registration System for regulations.gov. Administrative Law Review. Vol. 62, No. 4 (Fall 2010), pp. 1261-1285. American Bar Association https://www.jstor.org/stable/25758562. [accessed 22.02.2019]

Khan, MD Abir Hasan. (2017). E-Readiness of Public Administration In Developing Countries: A Case Study on Bangladesh Public Administrationâ€. Ph.D. diss., the School of Management of the University of Tampere. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2248 Tampere University Press https://remotelib.ui.ac.id [accessed 21.10.2017]

Labelle, Richard. (2005). A Comprehensive Guidebook: ICT Policy Formulation and E-Strategy Development. India: UNDP-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme.

Law and Lau. (2006). E-Rulemaking: Needs from ICT Perspectives. United States of Amerika: Stanford University.

Otis, Rick. (2010). E-Rulemaking Challenges in the United States Summary for Bertelsmann-GW Workshop on Regulatory Consultation. Washington D.C., USA: The George Washington University.

Shafie, D. M. (2008). Participation in E-rulemaking: Interest groups and the standard-setting process for hazardous air pollutants. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5(4), 399-410. doi:10.1080/19331680802546670

Sholihmu'adi. (2016). The Dynamic of Musrenbang Implementation with E-Musrenbang System. Journal and Basic Applied Scientific Research Vol 6. 24-32. http://www.textroad.com. [accessed 3.03.2019]

Shulman et.al. (2003). Electronic Rulemaking: A Public Participation Research Agenda for the Social Sciences. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21 No. 2, Summer 2003 162-178 DOI: 10.1177/0894439303251557.

Shulman, Schlosberg, and Zavestoski. (2006). Democracy and the Environment on the Internet: Electronic Citizen Participation in Regulatory Rulemaking. Jurnal Science, Technology, & Human Values 31, no. 4 (2006): 383-408 http://www.jstor.org/stable/29733948. [accessed 22.02.2019]

Williams. (2009). Understanding Public Policy Development as a Technological Process. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Vol. 23 Number 4 October 2009 448462 DOI: 10.1177/1050651909338809 https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id. [accessed 3.10.2019]

World Bank. (2017). Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance: Trends in Participatory Rulemaking, a Case Study http://rulemaking.worldbank.org/~/media/WBG/CER/Documents/Trends-inParticipatory-Rulemaking.pdf. [accessed 7.05.2019]

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32662/gjpads.v2i2.816

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.