Identification of Economic Impact Valuation on Small Industrial Centers (Study on the Sukaregang Leather Tannery Industrial Center)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32662/golder.v0i0.3421Keywords:
Economic Valuation, Externalities, Industry, Cost & Benefit AnalysisAbstract
This research aims to identify the magnitude of the economic impact caused by the existence of small industrial centers by taking a case study of the Sukaregang leather tanning industrial center. The method used in this research is cost and benefit analysis to obtain a valuation value for the externalities that arise. This research was conducted qualitatively by collecting data through interviews, observation and expert judgment. The research results found that the positive economic impact resulting from the activities of the Sukaregang leather tanning industrial center was in the form of employment, growth of the leather craft industry, creation of a supporting tourism subsector and improvement in community welfare. Meanwhile, the negative economic impacts caused are environmental pollution, disruption of the quality of public health and disruption of clean water sources. The valuation of the positive economic impact generated is estimated at IDR 68,516,318,340 per year, while the valuation of the negative economic impact is estimated at IDR 65,701,500,000 per year. The research found that the positive economic impact is estimated to be greater than the negative economic impact with a gap that is not too large, so it is a recommendation for the government and business actors to pay attention to green economic aspects in the industrial sector so that economic activities and regional development can run sustainably.
References
Jurnal :
Alvarezâ€Cuadrado, F., Van Long, N., & Poschke, M. (2017). Capital–labor substitution, structural change, and growth. Theoretical Economics, 12(3), 1229–1266.
Antrà s, P., & Chor, D. (2022). Global value chains. Handbook of International Economics, 5, 297–376.
Armelly, A., Rusdi, M., & Pasaribu, E. (2021). Analisis sektor unggulan perekonomian Indonesia: Model input-output. Sorot, 16(2), 119–134.
Djulius, H., Wongyu, C., Juanim, J., & Santy, R. D. (2019). Nexus of foreign direct investment, domestic investment, and manufacturing industry value added in Indonesia. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(1), 1–8.
Fitriyanti, R. (2016). Pertambangan Batubara: Dampak Lingkungan, Sosial Dan Ekonomi. Jurnal Redoks, 1(1).
Gerring, J. (2017). Qualitative methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 15–36.
Hong, Y., Lyu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, W. (2020). Industrial agglomeration externalities, local governments’ competition and environmental pollution: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123455.
Kebede, S. G. (2020). , Paper 3 Linkage of the Industry Sector with Other Sectors in the Ethiopian Economy: A SAM Multiplier Analysis. Essays on The Path to Industrialization in Ethiopia, 112.
Kurniawan, R., & Managi, S. (2018). Economic growth and sustainable development in Indonesia: an assessment. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 339–361.
Muljanto, M. A. (2021). Analisis Sektor Unggulan Dalam Pembangunan Daerah di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Publik, 5(2), 169–181.
Neffke, F. M. H., Otto, A., & Weyh, A. (2017). Inter-industry labor flows. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 275–292.
Nguyen, T. L. T., Laratte, B., Guillaume, B., & Hua, A. (2016). Quantifying environmental externalities with a view to internalizing them in the price of products, using different monetization models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 13–23.
Ning, L., Wang, F., & Li, J. (2016). Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities. Research Policy, 45(4), 830–843.
Padilla-Rivera, A., do Carmo, B. B. T., Arcese, G., & Merveille, N. (2021). Social circular economy indicators: Selection through fuzzy delphi method. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 101–110.
Muljanto, M. A. (2021). Analisis Sektor Unggulan Dalam Pembangunan Daerah di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Publik, 5(2), 169–181.
Neffke, F. M. H., Otto, A., & Weyh, A. (2017). Inter-industry labor flows. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 275–292.
Nguyen, T. L. T., Laratte, B., Guillaume, B., & Hua, A. (2016). Quantifying environmental externalities with a view to internalizing them in the price of products, using different monetization models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 13–23.
Ning, L., Wang, F., & Li, J. (2016). Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities. Research Policy, 45(4), 830–843.
Padilla-Rivera, A., do Carmo, B. B. T., Arcese, G., & Merveille, N. (2021). Social circular economy indicators: Selection through fuzzy delphi method. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 101–110.
Setianingtias, R., Baiquni, M., & Kurniawan, A. (2019). Pemodelan indikator tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 27(2), 61–74.
Setiawan, M., Indiastuti, R., Hidayat, A. K., & Rostiana, E. (2021). R&D and Industrial Concentration in the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 112.
Suzana, B. O. L., Timban, J., Kaunang, R., & Ahmad, F. (2011). Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Hutan Mangrove Di Desa Palaes Kecamatan Likupang Barat Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 7(2), 29–38.
Buku :
Amalia, F., Sinaga, R., Soeyatno, R. F., Silitonga, D., Solikin, A., Hubbansyah, A. K., Siregar, R. T., Maulina, D., Kusumaningrum, R., & Sahamony, N. F. (2022). Ekonomi pembangunan. Penerbit Widina.
Barrier, E. B. (2017). The concept of sustainable economic development. In The economics of sustainability (pp. 87–96). Routledge.
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeungt, H. W., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2017). ‘Globalizing’regional development: a global production networks perspective. In Economy (pp. 199–215). Routledge.
Fairbrother, M. (2016). Externalities: why environmental sociology should bring them in. Environmental Sociology, 2(4), 375–384.
Fang, D., & Chen, B. (2017). Linkage analysis for the water–energy nexus of city. Applied Energy, 189, 770–779.
Firdausy, C. M., Suryana, A., Nugroho, R., & Suhartoko, Y. B. (2019). Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan. Pusat Penelitian Badan Kealhian DPR RI, Jakarta.
Jomo, K. S. (2019). Southeast Asia’s misunderstood miracle: industrial policy and economic development in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. Routledge.
Loomisa, J., Kentb, P., Strangec, L., Fauschc, K., & Covichc, A. (2018). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. In Economics of water resources (pp. 77–91). Routledge.
Parmawati, R. (2019). Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam & Lingkungan Menuju Ekonomi Hijau. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif (Qualitative research approach). Deepublish.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2010). Metode Peneliian. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work under licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
