The Potency of the Tumih Village Farmer Community's Participation in the Agricultural Development Planning Strategy

Authors

  • Surti Surti Universitas Ahmad Yani
  • Syahrial Shaddiq Universitas Cahaya Bangsa
  • Ahmad Suhaimi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Amuntai
  • Muhammad Helmy Abdillah Politeknik Hasnur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32662/golder.v0i0.2389

Keywords:

Agricultural Development, Welfare, Farmer Income, Analysis Field of Strength, Power of Participation.

Abstract

In Tumih Village, Wanaraya District, Barito Kuala Regency, South Kalimantan Province, this study attempts to assess the strategy and growth of the agricultural sector as well as the level of community engagement in relation to agriculture. The settlement of Tumih itself has excellent potential for agriculture, particularly rice production. The analytical technique used employs the Strength Field Analysis approach to identify development plans and Participation Strength Analysis to identify the level of community involvement in agriculture in Tumih Village while determining the agricultural sector's strategy. The analysis' findings indicate that the key influencing elements for agricultural development plans in Tumih Village are the availability of human resources in the agricultural sector, particularly in the case of rice, and the farmers' receptivity to new technology. A hindrance in Tumih Village is the absence of irrigation and agricultural technologies. With only 36.5 percent, the assessment of the level of community involvement in planning for agricultural growth is still insufficient.

References

Buku :

Badan Pusat Statistik (2019) Hasil Survey Pertanian Antar Sensus (SUTAS) Tahun 2018

Badan Pusat Statistik (2021) Tenaga Kerja Berdasarkan Sektor Ekonomi Utama Tahun 2020

Badan Pusat Statistik (2011) Tabel Input-Output Indonesia Tahun 2010

Chambers, R. (1996). PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal: Memahami Desa Secara Partisipatif (6th ed.). Yogyakarta: Kanisius kerjasama dengan Yayasan Mitra Tani Yogyakarta. Arsyad, L. (2015). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Yogyakarta. STIM YKPN.

Cline, W. R. (2007). Global Warming and Agriculture: Impact Estimates by Country. Washington D.C: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Hoff, K. (2008). Joseph E. Stiglitz. World Bank.

Sianipar, J. P. G., & Entang, H. M. (2003). Teknik-teknik Analisis Manajemen. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara.

Susilowati, S. H., Hutabarat, B., Rachmat, M., Purwoto, A., Sugiarto, Supriyati, … PUSAT. (2010). Indikator Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan: Karakteristik Sosial Ekonomi Petani dan Usahatani Padi.

Todaro, Michael, P. (2010) Pembangunan Ekonomi Jilid 3. Jakarta. Erlangga.

Jurnal :

Handoyo, E. (2010). Konversi Lahan Pertanian Ke Non-Pertanian : Fungsi Ekologis yang Terabaikan. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 37(2), 118–126.

Indrayani, M., & Nurkholis. (2001). Persepsi Manajemen Perusahaan terhadap Prinsip-prinsip Good Governance (Studi pada 36 Perusahaan di Indonesia). TEMA, 2(2), 136–157.

Mendelsohn, R. (2008). The Impact of Climate Change on Cgriculture in Developing Countries. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450802495882

Mellor, J. W. (2001). Employment Multipliers from Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction. The Pakistan Development Review, 40(1), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.30541/v40i4ipp.371-400

Rahadian, A. S. (2010). Pertanian Terpadu dan Aspek Ketenagakerjaan di Perdesaan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 36(2), 267–285.

Ramlawati. (2020). Peranan Sektor Pertanian dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Kecamatan Galang Kabupaten Tolitoli. GROWTH: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(2), 173–193.

Rosenzwelg, C., & Parry, M. L. (1994). Potentian Impact of Climate Change on World Food Supply. Nature, 367(January), 133–138.

Sihombing, Y. (2022). Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian Berbasis Inovasi Teknologi sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Produksi Komoditas Pertanian Strategis dan Pendapatan Petani Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Agribisnis VI, 6(1), 137–143.

Steg, L. (2005). Environmental Problems and Human Behavior, 2nd edition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.01.003

Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Yonis, R. (2016). Penguatan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Pertanian (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Padang Pariaman). Jurnal Pembangunan Nagari, 1(2), 71–88.

Sumber Web :

Peraturan Menteri Pertanian. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor : 15/Permentan/OT.140/2/2013 tentang Program Peningkatan Diversifikasi dan Ketahanan pangan Masyarakat Badan Ketahanan Pangan Tahun Anggaran 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian. Retrieved from https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/ files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/MT_Globalization_Report_2018.pdf%0Ahttp://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43447/1/India_globalisation%2C society and inequalities%28lsero%29.pdf%0Ahttps: //www.quora.com/What-is-the

Dokumen lainnya :

Unit Pelaksana Teknis Dinas Pertanian Kecamatan Wanaraya (2021) Data Kelompok Tani Desa Tumih

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

04-10-2022

How to Cite

Surti, S., Shaddiq, S., Suhaimi, A., & Abdillah, M. H. (2022). The Potency of the Tumih Village Farmer Community’s Participation in the Agricultural Development Planning Strategy. Gorontalo Development Review, 5(2), 141 – 155. https://doi.org/10.32662/golder.v0i0.2389

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.